Psychoanalytic Perspectives on Interpreting Mythology: Freud vs. Jung
Introduction: The Mirror Called Myth, Two Gazes
Mythology is a giant psychological text left by humanity. The tools of psychoanalysis to read this text are largely divided into two branches. One is the lens of Sigmund Freud, tracking individual hidden desires, and the other is the lens of Carl Gustav Jung, exploring humanity’s common soul.
In this post, we will compare the decisive differences and charm of these two giants looking at myths.
1. Sigmund Freud: Myth is a Projection of Repressed Sexual Wishes
To Freud, myth was the ‘secular dream of the entire race.’ Just as dreams show individual repressed desires in disguise, he believed myths symbolically show the primitive instincts that humanity had to repress while building civilization.
- Oedipus Complex: The most famous concept Freud found in mythology. He explained that the reason why the story of King Oedipus, who kills his father and marries his mother, touches hearts across eras is that it touches the forbidden wishes we all had in infancy.
- Family Romance: He saw births’ secrets, abandoned children, and struggles for the throne, which frequently appear in myths, as the result of the projection of individual psychological conflicts wanting to be independent from parents.
In other words, to Freud, myth is a ‘record of dark desires’ that we had to give up to become social humans.
2. Carl Gustav Jung: Myth is a Message of Wisdom Sent by the Collective Unconscious
Jung was a disciple of Freud but became independent, presenting a much broader and more positive perspective in interpreting myths. To Jung, myth is not simply an ‘outlet for instincts’ but the embodiment of the ‘collective unconscious,’ a universal psychological structure accumulated by humanity for thousands of years.
- Archetype: Jung saw the reason why similar images (hero, mother, wise man, shadow, etc.) are repeated in myths around the world as being due to archetypes imprinted in our brain structure.
- Individuation Process: Jung interpreted the adventures of heroes in myths as a psychological growth drama where an individual finds their true Self. Myths serve as a compass telling us what internal tasks we need to solve to become whole humans.
To Jung, myth is a ‘storehouse of sacred symbols’ that helps in the healing and integration of the human spirit.
3. Comparison Points: Excretion of Desire, or Guide for Growth?
The difference between the two perspectives is clear.
| Classification | Sigmund Freud | Carl Gustav Jung |
|---|---|---|
| Origin of Myth | Individual repressed sexual instinct (Libido) | Universal collective unconscious of humanity (Archetype) |
| Key Keywords | Taboo, repression, explosion, past-oriented | Integration, archetype, symbol, future-oriented |
| Purpose of Interpretation | Exposure of hidden pathological conflicts | Self-realization and restoration of psychological balance |
Conclusion: Which Lens Do You Need?
Freud’s perspective makes us face honest and sometimes uncomfortable desires within us. On the other hand, Jung’s perspective makes us realize that our lives are in a larger order of humanity and presents a mysterious sense of connection.
Mythology is not a fixed correct answer. Sometimes put on Freud’s lens to meet ‘Oedipus’ within you, and sometimes follow Jung’s hero narrative to find the purpose of life. When you use these two lenses alternately, we can finally completely understand the giant temple called our minds.
In the next post, we will dig deeper into what types the ‘archetypes’ and ‘collective unconscious’ mentioned by Jung specifically appear as in myths.
Stay in the loop
Get the latest articles delivered to your inbox. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Subscribe →