Ch10. Civil Procedure — Comprehensive Review and Common Pitfalls
Federal Civil Litigation — Procedural Flow
Complaint filed → Summons issued → Service of process
→ Answer (or Rule 12 motion) filed
→ Rule 16 scheduling conference
→ Discovery (FRCP 26–37)
→ Summary judgment motions (FRCP 56)
→ Final pretrial conference → Trial
→ Verdict / Judgment → Post-trial motions (FRCP 50/59)
→ Notice of appeal (30 days) → Circuit Court
→ Petition for certiorari → Supreme Court
→ Final judgment → Enforcement (writ of execution,
garnishment, etc.)
Ways a case terminates without trial:
Judgment on the pleadings (FRCP 12(c))
Summary judgment (FRCP 56)
Voluntary dismissal (FRCP 41)
Settlement (with or without consent judgment)
Default judgment (FRCP 55)
Mediation / arbitration award confirmed as judgment
Key Numerical Rules at a Glance
Jurisdiction / venue:
Federal question: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 — any amount.
Diversity: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 — AIC > $75,000,
complete diversity of citizenship.
CAFA class action: AIC > $5 million aggregate,
minimal diversity.
Pleadings and answer:
Answer deadline: 21 days after service (FRCP 12(a)).
Waived-service answer: 60 days.
Discovery:
Initial disclosures: within 14 days of Rule 26(f) conf.
Depositions: max 10 per side (FRCP 30(a)(2)(A)).
Interrogatories: max 25 (FRCP 33(a)(1)).
Fact discovery closes: per scheduling order (Rule 16).
Motions and judgment:
Summary judgment: may be filed any time until
30 days after close of discovery (local rules vary).
Renewed JMOL: within 28 days of judgment (FRCP 50(b)).
Motion for new trial: within 28 days (FRCP 59(b)).
Rule 60(b) relief from judgment: "reasonable time"
(≤ 1 year for mistakes, fraud, etc.).
Appeals:
Notice of appeal: 30 days (private); 60 days (US party).
Cert petition: 90 days from circuit judgment.
Small claims (state court):
Dollar limit: varies — typically $5,000–$25,000.
Administrative review:
APA general SOL: 6 years (§ 2401(a)).
Specific agency statutes: often 30–60 days.
Comparison Charts
┌──────────────────┬──────────────────────┬──────────────────────┐
│ │ Civil Litigation │ Criminal Prosecution │
├──────────────────┼──────────────────────┼──────────────────────┤
│ Parties │ Plaintiff vs. │ Government vs. │
│ │ Defendant │ Defendant │
│ Purpose │ Compensate / │ Punish / deter │
│ │ enjoin │ │
│ Burden of proof │ Plaintiff bears │ Prosecution bears │
│ Standard │ Preponderance │ Beyond reasonable │
│ │ (> 50%) │ doubt │
│ Settlement │ Parties may settle │ Plea bargain only │
│ Governing rules │ FRCP / FRE │ Fed. R. Crim. P. │
└──────────────────┴──────────────────────┴──────────────────────┘
Ten Most-Tested Common Error Points
① Res judicata / claim preclusion = JUDGMENT, not reasoning
→ Only the relief granted in the judgment triggers
claim preclusion. Reasoning, dicta, and "alternative
holdings" are not claim-preclusive (but may be
issue-preclusive under collateral estoppel).
② Certiorari = legal issues only
→ The Supreme Court does not re-examine trial facts.
Factual findings are reviewed only for clear error
by the circuit court, not by the Supreme Court.
③ A default judgment has no res judicata effect on
claims the defendant could have filed (counterclaims
not pleaded in the defaulted action are not barred).
→ But a default judgment IS enforceable like any
final judgment.
④ Voluntary dismissal under FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(i):
First dismissal = without prejudice (re-filing allowed).
Second dismissal of the same claim = on the merits
(two-dismissal rule — re-filing barred).
⑤ Notice of appeal is filed in the DISTRICT COURT,
not the circuit court.
→ The district court clerk transmits the record up.
⑥ Family law = state court only.
→ Federal courts abstain from divorce, custody, and
alimony matters (domestic-relations exception to
diversity jurisdiction — Ankenbrandt v. Richards).
⑦ Non-reformation rule (no worsening a sole appellant's
position) — but the appellee can argue for affirmance
on any ground supported by the record even without
a cross-appeal.
⑧ Small claims judgments are NOT self-enforcing.
→ Prevailing party must use garnishment, levy, or
lien procedures to actually collect.
⑨ Burden of proof: plaintiff bears burden on every
element of the claim; defendant bears burden on
every affirmative defense.
→ An element the plaintiff fails to prove = judgment
for defendant, not a plaintiff win on fewer elements.
⑩ Standing (Article III):
Plaintiff must allege injury in fact, causation, and
redressability — all three required or the case
is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, not on the merits.
→ Dismissed for lack of standing = without prejudice.
Key Concept Cards
Three Core Principles of US Civil Procedure ★★★★★ : (1) Adversarial / party-driven; (2) pleading notice + discovery; (3) jury as independent fact-finder. Memory hook: Parties own the facts; jury decides them; judge keeps order
Three Effects of a Final Judgment ★★★★★ : Claim preclusion (res judicata) — bars relitigation; enforcement power — supports writs and garnishment; declaratory/injunctive effect — directly alters legal relations. Memory hook: Preclude, enforce, transform
Ways to Terminate a Case ★★★★★ : Trial verdict; summary judgment; voluntary dismissal; settlement; default judgment; judgment on the pleadings; arbitration award. Memory hook: Not every case needs a jury — most end sooner
Practice Quizzes (Comprehensive)
Q. What is the practical difference between a final judgment with claim preclusion and a default judgment without claim preclusion?
A final judgment entered after litigation on the merits carries full claim preclusion: the losing party cannot re-litigate the same claim or any claims that could have been brought in the same action. A default judgment, entered because the defendant failed to respond, also has full claim-preclusive effect as a judgment on the merits — the defendant is barred from later denying liability. However, a confirmed arbitration award or a consent decree has the same preclusive effect. The critical point is that lack of res judicata is not a feature of default judgments generally — all judgments are preclusive unless the court expressly dismisses without prejudice.
Q. When a plaintiff considers dismissing voluntarily under FRCP 41, what are the key strategic considerations?
(1) Timing: Before the defendant answers or moves for summary judgment, plaintiff may dismiss as of right under Rule 41(a)(1). After that point, plaintiff needs a court order (Rule 41(a)(2)) and may be subjected to conditions (e.g., payment of defendant’s fees). (2) Two-dismissal rule: A second voluntary dismissal of the same claim operates as an adjudication on the merits — plaintiff cannot re-file. (3) Limitations period: Dismissal without prejudice does not toll the statute of limitations; plaintiff must ensure there is time to re-file. (4) Counterclaims: If defendant has filed a compulsory counterclaim, dismissal of the complaint does not automatically terminate the counterclaim — the court may proceed on it independently.
OIYO Editorial
Content Editor지식 인큐베이터이자 전문 콘텐츠 크리에이터. 경영, 경제, 법률 및 실생활에 유용한 실무/자격증 중심의 깊이 있는 정보를 연구하고 공유합니다.