Ch2. Capital Budgeting — Making Investment Decisions with NPV, IRR, and Payback Period
What Is Capital Budgeting?
Capital Budgeting: The process of analyzing the economic viability of long-term investment projects and deciding whether to invest.
Capital Budgeting Techniques:
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF-based):
- NPV (Net Present Value)
- IRR (Internal Rate of Return)
- PI (Profitability Index)
Non-discounted:
- Payback Period (PP)
- Accounting Rate of Return (ARR)
NPV (Net Present Value)
NPV = Σ CF_t / (1+r)^t − Initial Investment
CF_t: Cash flow in period t
r: Discount rate (cost of capital)
Investment Decision Rule:
- NPV > 0 → Accept (increases firm value)
- NPV = 0 → Indifferent
- NPV < 0 → Reject
Example:
Initial investment: $10,000
Year 1 cash flow: $6,000
Year 2 cash flow: $7,000
Discount rate: 10%
NPV = $6,000/(1.10) + $7,000/(1.10)^2 − $10,000
= $5,454.5 + $5,785.1 − $10,000
= +$1,239.6 → Accept
IRR (Internal Rate of Return)
IRR: The discount rate at which NPV = 0.
0 = Σ CF_t / (1+IRR)^t − Initial Investment
→ Solve for IRR iteratively (trial and error or financial calculator)
Investment Decision Rule:
- IRR > Cost of capital (r) → Accept
- IRR < Cost of capital (r) → Reject
Problems with IRR:
① Multiple IRRs: If cash flow signs change more than once,
multiple IRRs may exist
② Mutually exclusive projects: NPV and IRR may give
conflicting rankings
→ NPV takes precedence in this case
③ Reinvestment assumption: IRR implicitly assumes
interim cash flows are reinvested at the IRR rate
(often unrealistic)
PI (Profitability Index)
PI = PV of future cash flows / Initial investment
= (NPV + Initial investment) / Initial investment
PI > 1: Accept (equivalent to NPV > 0)
PI < 1: Reject
Use case: Ranking investments when capital is constrained.
Payback Period
Payback Period: The time required to recover the initial investment from project cash flows.
Decision rule: Accept if payback period ≤ target period
Drawbacks:
- Ignores cash flows beyond the payback period
- Ignores the time value of money
- Focuses on liquidity rather than profitability
Discounted Payback Period: Calculates payback using discounted cash flows (accounts for time value of money).
When NPV and IRR Give Conflicting Signals
Comparing mutually exclusive projects:
Project A: NPV = $2,000, IRR = 20%
Project B: NPV = $3,000, IRR = 15%
NPV criterion → Choose B (greater value added)
IRR criterion → Choose A (higher rate of return)
→ NPV is the correct basis for decision
(aligns with the goal of maximizing firm value)
Why they conflict: Differences in project scale or the timing of cash flows.
Key Concept Cards
NPV Rule ★★★★★ : Accept if NPV > 0. The most superior technique because it directly measures the increase in firm value. Memory tip: NPV = PV of future CFs − Investment; positive means accept
Limitations of IRR ★★★★★ : Multiple IRRs and conflicting results with NPV for mutually exclusive projects. In these cases, NPV takes precedence. Memory tip: IRR limitations = multiple values + mutually exclusive conflicts
PI and Capital Rationing ★★★★☆ : When capital is constrained, investing in descending order of PI maximizes total NPV. Memory tip: Capital rationing → rank by PI
Practice Quiz
Q. Initial investment 6,000 for years 1–5; discount rate 8%. What is NPV?
Annuity PV = 6,000 × 3.9927 = 23,956 − 3,956 → Accept.
Q. Project A (NPV = 7,000, IRR = 18%). Which should you choose?
If mutually exclusive, choose B. NPV criterion takes precedence. A higher IRR does not necessarily mean greater value creation — NPV is the correct measure.
OIYO Editorial
Content Editor지식 인큐베이터이자 전문 콘텐츠 크리에이터. 경영, 경제, 법률 및 실생활에 유용한 실무/자격증 중심의 깊이 있는 정보를 연구하고 공유합니다.