CPA Exam FAR Deep Dive — US GAAP, Financial Instruments, and Consolidations
CPA FAR vs. Other Accounting Exams
FAR is consistently rated the hardest CPA section, and for good reason.
| 구분 | ||
|---|---|---|
CPA FAR is graded on a scaled score (0–99); the passing threshold is 75. This is NOT a raw percentage — the AICPA uses Item Response Theory to adjust for question difficulty. A “harder” form of the exam requires fewer correct answers than an “easier” form. Focus on mastering concepts rather than memorizing passing percentages.
Key FAR Topics — Financial Instruments
ASC 326 — Current Expected Credit Loss (CECL)
Classification of Debt Securities
- HTM (Held-to-Maturity): positive intent and ability to hold to maturity; reported at amortized cost
- AFS (Available-for-Sale): unrealized gains/losses in OCI; impairment through net income
- Trading: unrealized gains/losses through net income (like IFRS FVPL)
CECL Credit Loss Model (ASC 326, effective for most companies)
| Stage Equivalent | Condition | Allowance Measurement |
|---|---|---|
| General (all financial assets) | At origination | Lifetime expected credit loss |
| AFS debt securities | Fair value below amortized cost | ACL limited to the amortized cost–fair value difference |
Note: Unlike IFRS 9’s 3-stage ECL model, US GAAP CECL requires lifetime expected credit loss at origination for most instruments — a more conservative approach than IFRS Stage 1 (12-month ECL).
Effective Interest Method
Beginning carrying amount × effective interest rate = interest income
Interest income − cash interest received = amortization of discount
Ending carrying amount = beginning + amortization (discount bonds)
ASC 606 — Revenue Recognition
The 5-step model is equally central for FAR. CPA FAR frequently tests variable consideration and contract modifications.
Variable Consideration
- Expected value method: probability-weighted sum of possible outcomes
- Most likely amount method: single most likely outcome
- Constraint: include variable consideration only to the extent it is highly probable that a significant revenue reversal will not occur
Contract Modifications
| Scenario | Accounting Treatment |
|---|---|
| Separate contract | New goods/services are distinct AND priced at standalone selling price |
| Termination of old + new contract | Distinct goods/services but NOT at standalone selling price |
| Modification of existing contract | Goods/services NOT distinct → cumulative catch-up adjustment |
ASC 842 — Leases
Lessee Initial Measurement
Lease liability = PV of remaining lease payments (at lessee's
incremental borrowing rate if implicit rate unknown)
Right-of-use asset = Lease liability
+ Lease incentives paid to lessor
+ Initial direct costs
+ Prepaid lease payments
− Lease incentives received
Subsequent Measurement
- Lease liability: effective interest method; reduced by principal payments
- ROU asset (operating lease): straight-line amortization over lease term
- ROU asset (finance lease): amortized over shorter of lease term or useful life; interest on lease liability recorded separately
ASC 740 — Income Taxes (Deferred Tax)
Deferred Tax Calculation Flow
① Compare book carrying value vs. tax basis for each asset/liability
② Compute temporary differences
- Taxable temporary difference → Deferred tax liability
- Deductible temporary difference → Deferred tax asset
③ Apply enacted future tax rate (when difference reverses)
④ Assess valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
(more-likely-than-not criterion)
ASC 450 — Contingencies
Contingent Liability Recognition
| Probability | Estimable? | Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Probable | Yes | Accrue (debit expense, credit liability) |
| Probable | No | Disclose in footnotes |
| Reasonably possible | Either | Disclose in footnotes |
| Remote | Either | No disclosure required (unless guarantee) |
ASC 350 / ASC 360 — Intangibles and Impairment
- Internally developed intangibles: research phase → expense; development phase → capitalize only under strict criteria (not as broad as IFRS IAS 38)
- US GAAP generally expenses all internal development costs (ASC 730); software for internal use is an exception (ASC 350-40)
Cost Accounting Topics in FAR
Absorption vs. Variable Costing — Operating Income Difference
Absorption costing OI − Variable costing OI
= Ending inventory units × Fixed overhead per unit
− Beginning inventory units × Fixed overhead per unit
When production > sales → absorption costing income is higher (fixed overhead deferred in ending inventory).
Balanced Scorecard — Four Perspectives
| Perspective | Key Question | Sample Metrics |
|---|---|---|
| Financial | How do we look to shareholders? | ROI, EVA, revenue growth |
| Customer | How do customers see us? | Satisfaction scores, market share |
| Internal Process | Where must we excel? | Defect rate, cycle time |
| Learning & Growth | How can we improve? | Employee training hours, turnover |
Quality Cost Analysis — Four Categories
- Prevention costs: costs to prevent defects (design reviews, employee training)
- Appraisal costs: costs to inspect (finished goods inspection, quality audits)
- Internal failure costs: defect costs before shipment (rework, scrap)
- External failure costs: defect costs after shipment (warranty, returns)
Increasing prevention and appraisal costs should reduce internal and external failure costs — a classic trade-off.
Task-Based Simulation (TBS) Strategy
Response Format for Calculation TBSs
[Given information]
- Applicable standard: ASC 606 (Revenue Recognition)
- Number of performance obligations: 2
(software license + maintenance service)
[Calculations]
① Standalone selling prices: Software $900,000; Maintenance $300,000
② Allocation ratios: Software 75%, Maintenance 25%
③ Transaction price $1,000,000 allocated:
- Software: $750,000
- Maintenance: $250,000
[Answer]
Revenue recognized in the period:
- Software (point-in-time): $750,000
- Maintenance (ratably over 12 months; 3 months elapsed): $62,500
- Total: $812,500
Even if your final number is wrong, a logical, clearly labeled process showing the correct standard and method earns partial credit on TBSs. Never leave a TBS blank — always write out your approach.
Question Type Distribution
| 구분 | ||
|---|---|---|
Study Checklist
- ASC 326 — Distinguish CECL (US GAAP, lifetime ECL at origination) from IFRS 9 (3-stage ECL model)
- ASC 606 — Apply expected value and most-likely-amount methods to variable consideration
- ASC 842 — Calculate ROU asset initial measurement (5 components) for operating and finance leases
- ASC 740 — Complete deferred tax asset/liability calculation using 4-step flow
- ASC 450 — Identify probable + estimable threshold for accruing contingent liabilities
- ASC 350-40 — Know when internal-use software development costs are capitalized
- ASC 805 — Calculate goodwill and bargain purchase using acquisition method
- ASC 810 — Explain consolidation 5-step process; perform intercompany elimination entries
- ASC 323 — Apply equity method; calculate equity in earnings; eliminate unrealized profits
- EPS — Compute basic EPS and diluted EPS (dilutive securities: convertible bonds, options)
- Cost accounting — Calculate absorption vs. variable costing income difference
- Cost accounting — Explain Balanced Scorecard four perspectives
- TBS practice — Complete 4-hour timed mock exam at least 5 times
OIYO Editorial
Content Editor지식 인큐베이터이자 전문 콘텐츠 크리에이터. 경영, 경제, 법률 및 실생활에 유용한 실무/자격증 중심의 깊이 있는 정보를 연구하고 공유합니다.