US Labor Law Professional Exam — Part 2 Deep Dive: Case Analysis, HR Management & Administrative Process
The Essence of Part 2: Applied Analysis
The core skill tested in Part 2 is not memorization but application. Candidates must take a set of facts, identify the applicable statute or principle, and derive a well-reasoned conclusion.
Part 2 is essay- and analysis-based. Filling pages is less important than demonstrating a clear Issue → Rule → Application → Conclusion logical flow. That structure is what earns high scores.
IRAC: The Standard Answer Structure for Case Analysis
IRAC (Issue · Rule · Application · Conclusion) is the standard framework used in US law-school exams and professional credential exams alike.
The Four Steps
① ISSUE
"The issue in this case is whether Employer A's termination of
Employee B constitutes unlawful retaliation under Title VII."
② RULE
"Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibits an employer from
retaliating against an employee who has opposed an unlawful
employment practice or filed an EEOC charge (42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a)).
To establish a prima facie case, the employee must show: (1) protected
activity, (2) adverse employment action, and (3) causal connection."
③ APPLICATION
"Here, Employee B filed an EEOC charge on [date]. Two weeks later,
Employer A terminated B. The close temporal proximity creates a
rebuttable inference of causal connection. Employer A must articulate
a legitimate, non-retaliatory reason; the burden then shifts to B
to show pretext."
④ CONCLUSION
"Because B engaged in protected activity and suffered an adverse action
with close temporal proximity, B has established a prima facie
retaliation claim. Employer A must present a non-retaliatory
justification or face liability."
Frequently Tested Labor Law Scenarios
Scenario 1: Wrongful Termination Analysis
Analytical Framework
① Substantive justification
- Was there a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason?
- Did the employer apply its stated reason consistently?
② Procedural compliance
- Written termination notice provided?
- WARN Act notice (60 days for mass layoffs)?
- Progressive discipline / CBA procedures followed?
③ Conclusion: Both substantive and procedural requirements must be met
for a lawful termination.
Common Scenarios
- Verbal termination with no documentation → procedural defect → retaliation risk
- Immediate termination without progressive discipline → possible violation of CBA or handbook promise
- RIF / mass layoff: 4 WARN Act requirements (1,000+ employees / 100+ affected; 60-day notice; written notice to employees, state, and local officials; exceptions for unforeseeable circumstances)
Scenario 2: Employee vs. Independent Contractor Classification
The economic-realities test governs classification under the FLSA; the ABC test is used in some states.
Key Factors (Economic-Realities Test)
| Factor | Employee | Independent Contractor |
|---|---|---|
| Control over work | Employer dictates how | Worker controls method |
| Set schedule | Employer sets hours | Worker sets own hours |
| Substitution | Worker must perform personally | Worker may hire substitutes |
| Pay structure | Regular salary or hourly | Project-based or commission |
| Economic dependence | Worker depends on employer | Operates independently |
| Benefits enrollment | Enrolled in employer benefits | Obtains own benefits |
Scenario 3: Strike Legality
Analytical Framework
① Participant requirement: Are strikers employees protected by Section 7?
② Purpose requirement: Is the objective wages, hours, or working conditions?
(Political strikes or management prerogatives = not protected)
③ Procedural requirement:
- Was there a valid demand to bargain?
- Was good-faith bargaining conducted before the strike?
- Was a strike notice given (if required by CBA)?
④ Conduct requirement: No violence, sabotage, or unlawful secondary boycotts
Scenario 4: Unfair Labor Practice (ULP) Analysis
① Actor: Is the conduct attributable to the employer?
(Only employer ULPs; union ULPs are a separate category)
② Type of ULP: Identify which of the seven types applies
③ Causation: If interference/retaliation, show nexus to Section 7 activity
④ Remedy: File ULP charge with NLRB regional office within 6 months
HR Management: Five-Stage Framework
HR management questions combine theory with applied case scenarios.
HR Process — Five Stages
Motivation Theory
Content Theories (What motivates people?)
| Theory | Core Idea |
|---|---|
| Maslow’s Hierarchy | Physiological → Safety → Belonging → Esteem → Self-actualization |
| Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory | Hygiene factors (prevent dissatisfaction) vs. motivators (create satisfaction) |
| McGregor’s X/Y Theory | Theory X: control and direction; Theory Y: autonomy and participation |
| Alderfer’s ERG Theory | Existence, Relatedness, Growth; frustration-regression when higher need is blocked |
Process Theories (How does motivation work?)
- Vroom’s Expectancy Theory: Motivation = Expectancy × Instrumentality × Valence
- Equity Theory: compare input/output ratio to referent others; perceived inequity drives behavioral change
- Goal-Setting Theory: specific, challenging goals lead to higher performance (Locke & Latham)
BSC and KPI Performance Management
- BSC (Balanced Scorecard): balances four perspectives — financial, customer, internal process, and learning & growth
- KPI (Key Performance Indicator): quantitative measure of progress toward strategic objectives
- BSC-KPI integration: each strategic objective in the BSC strategy map is measured by one or more KPIs
Job Analysis and Job Evaluation
Job Analysis — systematic process of gathering information about job content and requirements
- Job Description: tasks, duties, responsibilities, working conditions
- Job Specification: minimum qualifications, skills, and experience required
Four Job Evaluation Methods
| Method | Characteristics |
|---|---|
| Ranking | Rank jobs relative to each other — simple but subjective |
| Job Classification | Pre-defined grade descriptions; assign jobs to grades |
| Factor Comparison | Compare jobs to benchmark jobs factor by factor; assign dollar values |
| Point-Factor | Assign points to compensable factors and sum — most objective |
Administrative Process: EEOC and NLRB Procedures
Full Wrongful-Termination Dispute Workflow
Three Key Topics in Administrative Law
① Filing Deadlines
| Claim Type | Deadline | Start Date |
|---|---|---|
| EEOC charge (discrimination) | 180 / 300 days | Date of discriminatory act |
| NLRB ULP charge | 6 months | Date of ULP |
| WARN Act complaint | 3 years (civil penalty) | Date of violation |
② Mediation and Conciliation
The EEOC encourages voluntary resolution through mediation before investigation.
- If mediated: charge withdrawn; settlement terms binding
- Mediation/conciliation agreements: same enforcement effect as a consent decree
③ Back-Pay and Reinstatement Orders
If an employer does not comply with an EEOC or NLRB remedial order, monetary penalties and court enforcement actions follow.
- NLRB enforcement: NLRB may apply to circuit court for enforcement
- EEOC enforcement: DOJ or private plaintiff may sue in federal court
- Back-pay amount: capped at 2 years (3 for willful FLSA violations)
Elective Subject (Employment Relations / Labor Economics) — Part 2 Exam Features
Part 2 requires the same elective subject chosen for Part 1.
| 구분 | ||
|---|---|---|
Study Checklist
- Labor law — written 3+ IRAC answers on wrongful-termination scenarios
- Labor law — can recite six factors of the economic-realities classification test
- Labor law — can apply four requirements for a protected strike to a fact pattern
- Labor law — memorized all employer ULPs and the 6-month NLRB filing deadline
- HR management — can explain all five stages: recruit/select, train, appraise, compensate, labor relations
- HR management — can compare four content motivation theories in a single essay
- HR management — can explain four job evaluation methods and their characteristics
- Admin process — can describe the five-step EEOC/court dispute workflow
- Admin process — memorized 180/300-day EEOC deadline and 6-month NLRB deadline
- Admin process — understands back-pay caps and enforcement mechanisms
- Exam writing — completed 5+ mock exams: three essay questions within 100 minutes
OIYO Editorial
Content Editor지식 인큐베이터이자 전문 콘텐츠 크리에이터. 경영, 경제, 법률 및 실생활에 유용한 실무/자격증 중심의 깊이 있는 정보를 연구하고 공유합니다.