Ch3. GMAT Verbal Reasoning — Critical Reasoning & Reading Comprehension
Verbal Reasoning Overview
GMAT Focus Edition Verbal Reasoning: 23 questions, 45 minutes
Question types:
- Critical Reasoning (CR): ~12–14 questions
- Reading Comprehension (RC): ~9–11 questions
CR is the highest-leverage skill for hitting 700+.
Critical Reasoning: Argument Structure
Every CR question contains an argument made of:
- Premises: Facts and evidence supporting the claim
- Conclusion: The claim being made based on premises
- Assumption: An unstated premise required for the argument to hold
CR Question Types & Strategies
1. Assumption Questions
Goal: Find the unstated premise the argument requires.
Negation Test: Negate each answer choice. If negating it destroys the conclusion, that’s the assumption.
Example:
- Premise: “80% of patients who took Drug X showed improvement”
- Conclusion: “Drug X is effective”
- Assumption: “Improvement was caused by Drug X, not other factors”
2. Strengthen Questions
Goal: Pick the choice that makes the conclusion more likely.
Trap: Don’t pick a choice that merely restates a premise. Look for something that closes the logical gap between premises and conclusion.
3. Weaken Questions
Goal: Pick the choice that makes the conclusion less likely.
Strategy: Attack the assumption. Don’t confuse “denying a premise” with “weakening the argument.”
4. Inference Questions
Goal: Find what MUST be true based on the given statements.
Critical rule: “Must be true” only — “could be true” is not enough.
5. Evaluate Questions
Goal: Choose the question whose answer would most help evaluate whether the argument is sound.
Reading Comprehension Strategy
3-Step Approach
Step 1: Map the structure (1–2 min) Identify the function of each paragraph:
- Main claim / Counter-argument / Evidence / Conclusion / Exception
Step 2: Identify the main point Summarize the entire passage in one sentence.
Step 3: Return to passage for specific questions Don’t re-read everything — go directly to the relevant paragraph.
RC Question Types
| Type | Approach |
|---|---|
| Main Idea | First/last paragraphs + overall flow |
| Detail | Locate specific paragraph, verify directly |
| Inference | Must be true based on passage; not explicitly stated |
| Purpose | Why does the author include this information? |
| Tone | Author’s attitude (positive/negative/neutral/critical) |
Practice Question
Q1 (Weaken). “Caffeine causes headaches — 70% of headache sufferers consumed coffee.” Which BEST weakens this?
A) 70% of headache sufferers drank coffee, but 80% of the general population also drinks coffee
B) Coffee contains many chemicals besides caffeine
C) There are many types of headaches
D) Some headache sufferers never drink coffee
E) Caffeine is found in beverages other than coffee
Answer: A — Without comparing to a control group, causation cannot be established from correlation alone.
Chapter 4 Preview
Next: Data Insights — Table Analysis, Graphics Interpretation, Data Sufficiency, and Multi-Source Reasoning.
OIYO Editorial
Editorial DeskThe OIYO editorial desk researches money, law, lifestyle, and self-understanding topics against primary sources and public statistics. Every piece carries source notes and is reviewed on a regular cycle for accuracy and usefulness.